News

$15 Million Verdict Against Nike Serves as Reminder That Workplace Discrimination Comes at a Steep Price for Employers

by Hannah R. Brefeld and Lucia Mead After approximately one day of deliberations, a federal jury in Oregon found Nike liable for more than $15 million in damages for violating federal and state anti-discrimination laws, finding Nike paid former employee, Heather Hender, less than similarly situated male colleagues and promoted...

Read More

Recent Developments in Mobley v. Workday: California Court Allows Key AI-Hiring Bias Claims to Move Forward

By Ethan Krasnoo and Lucia Mead On June 22, 2026, in Mobley v. Workday, Inc., U.S. District Judge Rita Lin largely denied Workday's motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint, including rejecting the company's argument that California's anti-discrimination laws do not apply to its screening of applicants outside California...

Read More

RPJ’s Gregory P. Feit Quoted in Law360 on Patagonia-Pattie Gonia Trademark Dispute

RPJ’s Gregory P. Feit was recently featured in a Law360 article examining the intersection of trademark enforcement, parody, commercial speech, and brand protection in the closely watched dispute between outdoor apparel company Patagonia and environmental activist and drag performer “Pattie Gonia.” The case centers on a trademark infringement lawsuit filed...

Read More

Recent Cases Highlight the Legality, Uncertainty, and Challenges Associated with the Increased Utility of AI in Hiring Employees

By Ethan Krasnoo As recounted below, recent lawsuits regarding the use of AI by companies in making employment hiring decisions highlight some serious legal challenges and concerns for employers. Last month, a class action lawsuit was filed in California state court against Eightfold AI Inc. As alleged in the suit,...

Read More

United States v. Smith et al.: Federal Indictment Charges Alleged Multi-Defendant Fraud and Conspiracy Scheme

By Tyla Swinton and Lucia Mead Legalized sports betting dramatically expanded in 2018 after the United States Supreme Court decided in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.,[1] that the provisions of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992, which prohibited state authorization and licensing of sports gambling schemes,...

Read More